Tarmle ([info]tarmle) wrote,
@ 2005-11-28 17:25:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:books, technology

An e-Paper Manifesto
Philips E-Ink hinged ebook reader.

The thing to be aware of with the invention of e-paper is that it will bring about a radical shift in the balance of power in printed media. The immense resources required to physically print, promote and distribute a novel have always necessitated that authors rely on publishers for a large part of the process of getting their work sold. As a result they also have to settle for a tiny portion of the profit from subsequent sales (and that's only if the publisher deems their work to be worthy of publishing at all).

So here is a an old question from the heady days of the early internet: What happens when all anyone needs to have their writing published is access to the internet, and the entire publishing cycle from creation to world-wide promotion is executed from a spare bedroom?

E-Ink Reader.Lets be clear: the reason books are not read from web sites today is because reading from a CRT or LCD display is just not comfortable enough. That's where e-paper comes in, a light, flexible, high contrast, non-illuminated, low power display device that closely replicates the experience of reading a static printed page, a technology that makes reading electronic documents a pleasure rather than an eye-straining chore. Granted this technology is not quite there yet but it is well on the way.

Publishing a novel on the internet is likely to be no more convoluted than publishing a blog. But getting a work promoted and actually sold on the internet will still require a resource that is in short supply even there – that precious resource is attention. Just as current publishers are also a promotional service if only by virtue of their selection of works, so the eBook sellers will act as trusted filters for the mass of available material. The process of buying these books is likely to be something very similar to Amazon only when a volume is purchased it is delivered immediately with no other human interaction. The publishing industry of the future is likely to involve only the staff required to operate and maintain a web site and it's servers.

Slim E-Ink display compared with the thickness of a coin.And this is where the power shift comes in. Until now publishes commanded the royalties passed on to the authors because it was clearly necessary to reimburse them for the resources they employ. But when the sale of a few dozen copies of a new novel at current prices can pay for an entire month of high-bandwidth web hosting it's rather more difficult to argue such liberties (a quick experiment and calculation suggests that a 1000Gb transfer limit is enough for around 3-4 million downloads of text-only novels in a compressed format). At say €5 per download this form of publishing could involve a profit margin that would turn your average socialist into a corporate butt-monkey overnight. So with these massive profits and minimal work on the part of the publisher do we think authors will be happy with a hundred thousand Euro and the usual percentages in royalties?

What authors will realise is that the publishing process itself has become extraordinarily streamlined and as a result they are doing the vast majority of the work involved in the industry. They will not only want to see a far greater return for that work but will, importantly, want far greater control of their creations. New works will no longer be bought or even controlled by publishers they will be merely be distributed by them and it is they that will receive the smaller percentage of the profits from these sales.

It's likely that old-style publishers moving into the online market will try to enforce their pre-existing contract scheme. They will fail. Entrepreneurs will quickly realise that for a lower profit margin and more flexible contracts (more akin to a hosting policy than a publishing deal) they will draw more writers and will gain the pick of every crop, and all of this with an outlay that is both microscopic and scalable and can even be dropped instantaneously with no serious collateral damage. In fact all they need is the technical know-how and the world of publishing will belong to them.

That's the bottom line. In this New World Order of literature it is the authors who have everything to gain while still doing the same thing they have always done, and the publishers who will lose everything to their quicker, brighter descendants.

It's going to get very messy for while, it could even rival the world of online music sales for ferocity and general mayhem. But for those left standing, there is going to be a hell of a lot of money to be made.

For now I'll leave you to imagine for yourselves how e-paper is going to change the world of newspapers, magazines and comics...

Large E-Ink display connected to a mobile phone.

E-Ink Corporation
Fujitsu Wireless E-Paper
LG.Philips LCD and E Ink corp USA
Fuji Xerox E-Paper Visual Index Card prototype (admittedly a low-end version of the technology)




(Post a new comment)


[info]cargoweasel
2005-11-28 06:16 pm UTC (link)
e-paper will change publishing as much as the iPod changed the music business.

The iTunes Music Store is an example of a fully digital paid music distribution mechanism. And it is quite profitable. The record labels have found a point they like to be at, that the consumer will pay for.

If you can download a book for 5 bucks someone else will be offering the same book for free. The publishers will adapt better than you think. A book is more than its text, and even more than a high resolution display of that text. A book is a designed object.

For all my life I've seen breathless predictions of the deaths of traditional, corrupt media industries at the hands of a scrappy new technology. The Internet and PCs did not kill cable TV, it brought us fox news and Tivo. MP3s did not kill record labels, it brought us iPods and iTunes and DRM-crippled CDs and BitTorrent. TV did not kill radio, it shifted radio into your car. And movies did not kill live theater, or photography kill painting.

Authorship will change, but adoption of new technology never behaves as predicted.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]tarmle
2005-11-28 08:16 pm UTC (link)
You're absolutely right, I don't think dead tree books are going to disappear at all. There will always be a place for the physical object, and it will be very difficult to separate people from their sentimental attachment to them. A physical book with a note in the cover as a gift will always mean more than a gift code for an e-book merchant [although it occurs to me that an ebook could be 'sent' with a note encoded into it].

I didn’t touch on DRM here as it's a convoluted subject of mixed virtue that's going to get more tortuous long before it gets any simpler and would only confuse the issue. But this is the issue that will scare away both publishers and authors, and the fact that the music industry is facing this right now is going to scare them even more. Authors, like most musicians, expend a great deal of time and effort producing their work and need to be rewarded for that effort. At the moment their work and royalties are protected by a physical format from which it is currently very difficult to extract the content. The thing is, the most popular works, such as the last Harry Potter novel, are already being extracted from their physical formats for free distribution by readers who want them in that format. I've said before that this technology will end up owning the publishing world if they don’t own it first, and this is going to get oh-so-messy.

Hopefully someone will invent some magical vendor-free biometric DRM in which the documents themselves will recognise their rightful owners regardless of the reader's hardware or software... it's a happy dream. I'll admit, this is the reason I'm not buying from iTunes until the Hymn project catches up, not because I want to illegally distribute the files but just so I can listen to the music I've paid for any place, any time and on any piece of hardware I like, and I'm going to feel the same way about eBooks, I'm sure.

I think the predicted changes in many of these areas were/are wrong in time-scale more than results. The overly tentative steps of content providers moving into the internet's highly dynamic, and admittedly very scary, environment is only going to encouraging the independent developers to begin making the move for them, but in a much more uncontrolled fashion. These things will come to pass, and heel-dragging is only going to foster contempt.

I anticipate someone building a fully automated bound-book scanning machine (probably out of Lego[s]) that will churn through a thousand-volume library in an afternoon, and leave a neatly organised set of open PDFs, auto-proofed by a GPL AI system.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]natowelch
2006-01-25 08:41 pm UTC (link)
The iPod did not change the music business. The iTunes Music store, maybe, but the iPod is just an overpriced walkman that happens to hold your entire music collection. Internet mp3 downloads have changed the music industry. Before the iPod, you just burned cds to play in your mp3-capable cd walkman. No news there.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shockwave77598
2005-11-28 07:18 pm UTC (link)
They first must make an ebook reader program that is easy to put books into and easy to use. I refer you to my nightmarish experience attempting to read something, documented in general strokes within my LJ.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]tarmle
2005-11-28 08:26 pm UTC (link)
Can't believe I missed that post. That's an absolutely textbook DRM horror story for both clients and providers. Piracy is only going to be encouraged by making these things such a chore.

Just wait until we get into Trusted Computing territory, that really will be a user's nightmare.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…